On 18/11/2010 19:21 VanguardLH wrote:
> NOTE: FollowUp-To header was ignored. The original newsgroups were
> reinstated in my reply.
Note: I'll set the headers for my posts the way I want them. You set
them for yours the way you want them. By continually forcing your views
you ruin the threading.
> F wrote:
>
>> VanguardLH wrote:
>>
>>> Tough cookies. You don't know Usenet netiquette. Noobs don't profess a
>>> netiquette they haven't even embraced yet.
>>
>> Note: I don't need to justify myself to any self-appointed Netcop,
>
> Oh really. And you aren't a self-appointed netcop yourself in
> justifying YOUR particular [rude] style? One netcop whining about
> another netcop.
Note: The only Netcop around here is yourself. I am simply stating the
position. As for being rude, you really should read what you post.
Note: Re-read your (objectionable) first response. It would appear that
you don't like to be challenged.
>> but I've been using Usenet since the early 80s.
>
> Not provable by you. So those 4,290,000 posts are all from you, huh?
> ~392 posts every single day. That's extremely prolific of you.
> (rolls eyes)
Note: I don't have to prove anything to you and have not claimed
ownership of all Usenet posts. You are clearly incapable of
differentiating between using, posting and reading.
Note: I don't intend to respond further. I don't wish to be dragged down
to your level.
F